fbpx

Leading Brexiteer admits Boris Johnson’s Brexit solution can’t be implemented yet

Self-appointed Brexit “hard man” Steve Baker has admitted that Boris Johnson’s “solution” to the Irish border can’t actually be implemented yet.

Johnson’s new offer to the EU proposes that the whole of the UK, including Northern Ireland, would leave the customs union – requiring checks on some goods flowing between the North and the Republic.

Advertisements

Johnson suggests that technology would be able to solve any delays associated with these checks – thereby preventing a hard border. However, Baker has admitted that this technology would “take some time” to implement.

Speaking on BBC Newsnight last night, the Brexit fanatic was stumped by a question from Emma Barnett, asking why a recent parliamentary report said that technological solutions would only be available in two to three years.

Baker, who was part of the group of MPs who assessed these measures, said: “We did recognise the full suite of alternative arrangements would take some time to implement.”

To this, Barnett posed the even trickier question: “Hang on, are you actually saying the Prime Minister has written to the EU saying we can do something that we can’t actually do yet?”

After this, Baker’s tough guy facade melted, and he quickly tried to change the subject.

READ NEXT: New Yorker Steve Baker: Twitter account parodies Brexit ‘hardman’

Essentially, if MPs and the EU sign up to Boris Johnson’s Brexit plan, they would be placing their faith in the vague hope that technological solutions (that, by the way, have never been implemented anywhere else in the world) will be able to deliver a seamless border in Northern Ireland and uphold the peace process.

No chance.

3 responses to “Leading Brexiteer admits Boris Johnson’s Brexit solution can’t be implemented yet

  1. Of course the technology exists – it just has to be designed and build to suit the border requirements in the same way an architect would design a house to set requirements – not difficult or cutting new ground – simply requires time to construct

    1. @Gibbs: maybe you should advise Norway and Sweden. It’s somewhat embarrassing that they haven’t figured out yet how to do it.

      1. Sweden and Norway have a different relationship (READING takes you a long way) even before the EU and even then still is hard border.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your privacy

Scram News is part of Scram Media Limited (Scram Media). We and our partners use technology such as cookies on our websites to provide social media features, personalise content and advertising, and analyse our traffic. Click Accept All to consent to the use of this technology across our sites and the wider web. Alternatively, click Manage Settings to personalise your consent choices.

Manage settings |
Manage Settings